2 min read
Wrongful Termination and Maritime Claims against Oasis Systems
The case of Brian Compton v. Oasis Systems, LLC presents a legal dispute involving wrongful termination and various ...
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) stands as a guardian for those who serve or intend to serve in the uniformed services. It firmly forbids employers from making decisions that negatively impact someone's job opportunities — including hiring, rehiring, job stability, promotions, or any employment benefit — based on their current or prospective service in the military § 4311. This law is a shield against discrimination and retaliation for those who dedicate themselves to serving our country.
Additionally, USERRA firmly establishes protections against workplace discrimination or negative actions aimed at individuals striving to enforce the rights provided by this law. Whether engaging in legal proceedings, assisting in investigations, offering testimony, or merely asserting their USERRA rights, individuals are shielded from any retaliatory actions § 4311. This guarantees that those who advocate for their own rights, or the rights of their peers, under these rules, are immune to any employer-induced retaliation or discrimination.
The Merit Systems Protection Board plays a pivotal role in reviewing complaints related to the employment or reemployment of individuals by Federal executive agencies or the Office of Personnel Management. Should the Board find an agency in violation of this chapter's stipulations, it has the authority to mandate compliance and award compensation for any losses of wages or benefits resulting from the non-compliance § 4324. This serves as a mechanism for enforcing rights within Federal executive agencies.
When an individual seeks to return to employment after serving in the uniformed services, they must present their employer with the necessary documentation. This documentation serves to verify that their reemployment request is made within the appropriate time frame, that their service duration falls within the limits established by the Act, and that they are still eligible for the benefits outlined in this chapter, as per § 4312. This is a cornerstone of the reemployment rights for those who have served our nation.
Furthermore, the concept of "undue hardship" is precisely outlined in the Act. It describes scenarios that pose a considerable challenge or financial burden, taking into account factors such as the specific actions required by this chapter, the financial capacity of both the facility in question and the employer at large, as well as the nature of the employer's business operations, as defined in § 4303. This definition ensures that the rights and obligations under the Act are balanced with the practical capabilities of the employer.
USERRA is not applicable to independent contractors nor does it extend benefits to the family members of the employee or applicant. It is important to note that this Act does not override any law, regulation, or collective bargaining agreement that provides more generous rights than those afforded by USERRA. Conversely, it takes precedence over any state laws, regulations, or collective bargaining agreements that would limit the rights provided under USERRA or impose additional obligations on service members, as outlined in Servicemember and Veterans Rights § 2.01.
Similar to the protections offered by the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), USERRA safeguards the employment and reemployment rights of employees who must take leave for military duties. Yet, USERRA goes a step further by offering more comprehensive protections for those on military leave and by placing more stringent requirements on employers regarding the notice and documentation required from employees. It mandates that employees, or a designated official from the service member’s military branch, must provide advance notification to their employer regarding their need for military leave.
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) offers robust safeguards for individuals serving in the military. This seminal legislation ensures that military service does not lead to discrimination within the employment sphere, safeguarding the rights to obtain, return to, maintain employment, ascend in one's career, or enjoy any employment-related benefits without prejudice. This includes protection against discrimination based on one’s status or activities related to military service, as well as safeguards against any form of retaliation for seeking to uphold the rights USERRA guarantees, as elucidated in the case of Garcia-Ascanio v. Spring Indep. Sch. Dist., 74 F.4th 305.
Eligibility for USERRA's protections extends to a wide array of service members: those currently serving, applicants to service, and those with an obligation to serve. This includes not only full-time active duty personnel across all branches of the U.S. Armed Forces but also encompasses individuals in active-duty training, members of the Army and Air National Guards, the Commissioned Officer Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. Furthermore, USERRA covers individuals involved in the National Urban Search and Rescue Response System during times of national crises, those performing military funeral honors, service members undergoing fitness examinations, individuals appointed for training or service within the Federal Emergency Management System (FEMA), among others, as well as any additional groups designated by the President during periods of war or national emergency, as highlighted in the context of Understanding Military Discrimination under USERRA.
USERRA sets a foundational baseline, not a limit, for the employment and reemployment rights and advantages it affords to those under its protection. Employers are at liberty to extend rights and benefits beyond what USERRA prescribes, yet they are prohibited from denying any right or benefit that USERRA ensures. Importantly, USERRA has precedence over any state legislation, contracts, agreements, policies, plans, practices, or any other provisions that in any way diminish, restrict, or nullify the rights or benefits stipulated by USERRA.
Furthermore, USERRA encompasses certain pension schemes not included under ERISA, such as those established by state or local governments, or religious organizations for their employees. It's worth noting, however, that pension benefits provided through the Federal Thrift Savings Plan are outside the scope of USERRA's coverage.
USERRA establishes a detailed enforcement structure that cannot be circumvented by filing a claim of constitutional infringement under 42 USCS § 1983. This unique pathway ensures that service members' rights are vigorously protected, specifically addressing situations where an employer’s actions make a service member's workplace unbearably hostile, forcing them to resign. In such instances, USERRA expressly forbids the termination of employment due to military obligations, enabling a constructive discharge lawsuit as demonstrated in the Garcia-Ascanio v. Spring Indep. Sch. Dist., 74 F.4th 305 case.
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) safeguards the rights of uniformed servicemembers to regain their civilian employment after completing their service. To qualify for reemployment, servicemembers must notify their employer about their deployment in advance, ensure their service duration does not surpass five years, and either report back to their job or formally request reemployment after their service ends. The requirement to report back or request reemployment is dependent on the length of the service period. For absences of less than 31 days, servicemembers are expected to resume work at the start of the next regularly scheduled workday following their return, as outlined by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) under USERRA Appeals. The Department of Defense advises that notices of service, preferably in writing, be given to civilian employers in advance, though verbal notifications are also compliant with USERRA's guidelines. Notably, the specifics regarding advance notice were updated as of June 5, 2020. Documentation requirements to prove eligibility for reemployment may differ on a case-by-case basis. Employers are mandated to provide the same paid military leave benefits as they do for other types of comparable leave. USERRA prevails over any state law or employment policy that might detract from the rights or benefits it guarantees. Reemployment should be promptly executed within two weeks following an application for reemployment, barring exceptional circumstances. Employers are prohibited from delaying reemployment by demanding documents that are not available or do not exist. The reemployment position, known as the escalator position, might vary upon return, potentially resulting in a higher or lower role, or in some cases, termination, depending on the specific situation and in accordance with the escalator principle's potential impacts.
According to the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), reemployment timelines are directly tied to the duration of military service. For service periods ranging from 31 to 180 days, service members are required to report back to work or submit a reapplication within 14 days. For those whose service extends beyond 180 days, a 90-day window is provided for reporting or reapplication. In circumstances where reporting back within these timeframes proves to be impossible or unreasonable due to no fault of the service member, extensions may be granted. While reapplication requests can be verbal, it's highly recommended to submit these requests in writing to mitigate potential disputes and documentation issues. Failing to meet USERRA's deadlines doesn't strip a service member of all protections under the act. Nonetheless, employers may treat any delays in reporting back to work akin to any other instance of unauthorized absence, as outlined under USERRA guidelines for addressing military discrimination. For service durations shorter than 31 days, service members are expected to resume their employment at the start of the next full day of their regular work schedule following their service, no later than the first full calendar day thereafter. Should the service period exceed 30 days, employers have the right to request documentation proving that the service member's application for reemployment is timely, as per USERRA's stipulations.
Under the protections offered by the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), employees returning to their civilian jobs after serving in the military are guaranteed to reclaim their previous seniority level, along with all associated rights and benefits. This assurance includes any advancements in position or benefits they would have earned had their employment been uninterrupted. The law clearly states that time away for military duties does not count as a break in their employment history.
This encompasses both employer-provided rights and benefits and those mandated by law. For example, a service member returning to civilian work may qualify for leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. This eligibility hinges on whether the total months and hours they were employed, combined with the hypothetical months and hours they would have been employed during their military service, satisfy the FMLA's eligibility criteria. Upon reemployment, the position offered should accurately mirror the salary, benefits, seniority, and other job perks the employee would have enjoyed if their service hadn't interrupted their career. Moreover, the aspects of an employment position such as seniority, status, and salary must also consider any adjustments made by a collective bargaining agreement. While serving in the uniformed services, an employee is considered to be on furlough or leave of absence, ensuring they're entitled to the same non-seniority rights and benefits as other employees in similar positions who are on leave, maintaining a seamless integration between their military and civilian careers.
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) outlines three distinct remedies under federal law to protect servicemembers' employment rights. Firstly, injunctive relief is available, compelling adherence to USERRA's requirements, as highlighted in the case Lovell v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc., 758 Fed. Appx. 222. Secondly, for losses incurred due to an employer's non-compliance, compensation for lost wages and benefits is provided. The third remedy involves liquidated damages, effectively doubling the compensation for lost wages and benefits in instances of deliberate non-compliance with USERRA, as seen in Lovell v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc., 758 Fed. Appx. 222, within the scope of Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation (Federal). Moreover, successful claimants may also be awarded reasonable attorney's fees, expert witness fees, and other costs related to litigation under Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation (Federal). Additionally, the court has the authority to prevent individuals from enforcing discriminatory policies in the future and to mandate compensation for any financial damages suffered.
Under the provisions of USERRA, an employee forfeits their right to reemployment if their departure from military service is deemed dishonorable. This forfeiture occurs if the individual receives a discharge due to dishonorable or bad conduct, or if their separation is classified as under conditions other than honorable, according to the rules that govern military service. Moreover, the reemployment protections are nullified for commissioned officers who are expelled following a general court-martial's verdict, a commutation of such a sentence, or by a presidential order during wartime. Additionally, commissioned officers lose eligibility for reemployment if they are removed from the military register for being AWOL for three months or more, if they are separated following a court-martial's decision to confine, or if they are sentenced to time in a federal or state prison or correctional facility.
In accordance with federal law in the United States, specifically the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), it's unlawful for employers to exhibit discrimination against employees or potential hires due to their history or current involvement in military service. This prohibition is detailed in 38 USCS § 4311, which clarifies that an employer's actions are deemed discriminatory if a person's military service influences the employer's decision, except in cases where the employer can demonstrate that the same decision would have been made regardless of the individual's military service status. Discrimination towards individuals in the uniformed services, as well as retaliation against them, is forbidden. This statute encompasses both reservist and active-duty military personnel, as evidenced in Alves v. City of Gloucester, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8924. Nonetheless, judicial interpretations have clarified that USERRA is not breached by an employer who denies certain employment benefits due to an employee's service-connected disability, as seen in Kelly v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist., 604 F. Supp. 3d 800. Moreover, to pursue a successful claim of military service-based discrimination, an employee must identify an applicable remedy available to them.
After graduating from law school, Danyelle served as an Equal Employment Opportunity Specialist at the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs (OFCCP), where she used contracts to promote and protect civil rights, managed major and minor audits for compliance with U.S. anti-discrimination laws, and handled complaints against large government contractors.
Before joining the firm, Brickelle held several law clerk positions, including working with the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland. In this position, she aided the UN Secretary of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities during the 24th session of the committee.
Get Started in
Jan 18, 2024 by Joe Whitcomb
The case of Brian Compton v. Oasis Systems, LLC presents a legal dispute involving wrongful termination and various ...
Jan 12, 2024 by Joe Whitcomb
In a worker classification dispute, John Douglas Burke has raised concerns regarding his entitlement to additional...
Nov 8, 2023 by Joe Whitcomb
Former employee Graham Chase Robinson has filed a complaint against her previous employer, Canal Productions, Inc., and...
Colorado
300 Union Boulevard
Suite 200
Lakewood, CO 80228
(303)-647-1045 (local)
(303)-534-1958 (local)
Virginia
818 Sophia Street
Fredericksburg, VA 22401
(804)-773-4699 (local)
(804)-773-4699 (fax)
© 2024 · All Rights Reserved · Whitcomb, Selinsky, PC