3 min read
Clawback Provisions and How They Might Impact Your Company
What is a Clawback Provision?
Clawback provisions are clauses that specify a set of factors or situations in which...
In September 2017, United Technologies and Rockwell Collins announced they had brokered a deal for United Technologies to acquire the airplane electronics and avionics parts manufacturer Rockwell Collins for $30 billion. This acquisition, facilitated by an experienced acquisitions lawyer, was a strategic move in line with both companies’ business goals. Through the transaction, UTC Aerospace Systems, which will be renamed Collins Aerospace Systems, will increase its aerospace capabilities and technology aerospace systems, showcasing the importance of deal structure in corporate law.
Also, in September 2017, Northrup Grumman shared that it would acquire a rocket and defense contractor, Orbital ATK, for $9.2 billion. Northrup's portfolio will expand to include a missile defense business and the ability to launch rockets that carry satellites into space. Such cross-border transactions emphasize the complexities involved in M&A law and regulatory compliance.
Companies and private equity funds that want to expand their portfolios through the purchase of SMB government contractors must take particular caution through the due diligence process because such acquisitions are fraught with potential landmines that will slow or even terminate the proposed deal. To acquire a company that holds government contracts, both parties must comply with many federal regulations before the government approves the transaction. The agency must recognize the buyer as a successor-in-interest for the seller's government contracts or subcontracts. All compliance obligations transfer to a buyer, therefore the buyer must be able to fulfill its new set of compliance responsibilities to the satisfaction of the government's contracting officers.
The failure to resolve these types of issues (from tax implications and corporate governance and similar compliance issues) during the M&A process can be catastrophic. There must be a detailed analysis of the deal structure and a plan to address any of the financial impacts of a status change that would be caused as a result of the merger or acquisition, including the valuation of assets and purchase price. All necessary government approvals must be obtained before the transfer of any government assets. The potential loss of business opportunities for the buyer or the merged new entity, and in particular in situations that can result in a suspension or debarment of the contractor, or civil and criminal penalties requires careful government contracts due diligence. An experienced law firm will quickly identify these and other risks before the transaction progresses. It is essential to ensure that both parties obtain adequate disclosures and indemnifications, make thorough and accurate representation and certifications, and receive all necessary approvals from the government so that the proposed acquisition is successful and profitable.
This article is not intended to constitute legal advice and is intended for informational purposes only.
Government contractors have significantly increased mergers and acquisitions in recent years. A stream of recent stories in the Washington Post and New York Times have documented this. The acquisition of a business that has earned a government contract frequently provides the buyer an opportunity to increase its market share and strengthen its capabilities within an existing industry. The addition may also allow the new parent company to expand its portfolio to market and develop a new government contracting capability that was previously not available.
In the process of government contractor mergers and acquisitions, these problems may arise:
1. Disclosure of any contractual or regulatory non-compliance that predates the transaction, including violations of the False Claims Act.
2. Are there any prior suspensions or debarments that may affect the company to be acquired.
3. Past performance ratings of the company to be acquired by government agencies, and the impact of those scores on the buyer's ability to win other government contracts.
4. Analysis of the remaining years and potential accounts receivable income from existing and potentially new contracts held by the business to be purchased.
5. The assignment or novation of the government contracts from the business being purchased.
6. The loss of small business status or other socio-economic preferences that were initially used for the award of government contracts and will change as a result of the acquisition.
7. The transfer of top-secret clearances and facility access.
8. Transfer of the intellectual property rights owned by the business being purchased.
9. Conflicts of interest, which may prevent the buyer from bidding on future government contracting opportunities.
10. Are all of the Federal Supply Schedules current, up-to-date, and compliant with specific regulations (Price Reduction Clause).
11. Are there subcontracts and teaming agreements the business to be purchased may hold, will they remain enforceable and compliant after the transaction.
12. Foreign purchases require CFIUS notification and foreign ownership and control mitigation plans.
At Whitcomb Selinsky, PC, our federal government procurement lawyers can assist your business with a wide range of legal matters pertaining to federal government procurement and contracts with government agencies, including but not limited to the following:
Other legal matters may also arise in government procurement, and the dedicated government procurement attorneys at Whitcomb Selinsky, PC, can assist your business.
Navigating mergers and acquisitions in the context of government contracts is a challenge. There are various legal regulations and considerations at play, which can make it difficult to understand the proper course of action. However, a knowledgeable government contracts attorney can make all of the difference to help you avoid pitfalls and resolve any issues that might arise.
M&A encompasses various structures depending on the strategic goals and the relationship between the companies involved. Here are some common types:
A successful M&A deal requires careful planning and consideration of several factors:
Strategic fit with the client's business: Do the companies' goals, target markets, and product lines complement each other? Will the combined entity be stronger and more competitive?
Financial performance: Conducting thorough due diligence is crucial. Analyze the target company's financial health, including profitability, debt levels, and growth potential.
Regulatory approvals: Ensure the deal complies with antitrust laws that prevent reduced competition in a market. Additionally, industry-specific regulations might require specific approvals.
Integration challenges: Merging two companies involves integrating operations, cultures, and leadership teams. Carefully planning the integration process is critical to ensure a smooth transition and maximize the deal's potential.
By carefully considering these factors, companies can increase their chances of a successful M&A transaction. For expert guidance, contact our experienced M&A Lawyers today to ensure your deal is successful and compliant.
While both mergers and acquisitions involve combining businesses, there's a key distinction in their outcome:
Merger: This creates a completely new legal entity. Both companies involved cease to exist independently and contribute assets and operations to form the new entity. Ownership is often divided between the original shareholders of both companies.
Acquisition: One company takes over another. The acquired company dissolves, and its assets and operations become part of the acquiring company. The acquiring company's shareholders maintain ownership, and the acquired company's shareholders typically receive compensation (cash, stock, or a combination) for their shares.
Joe Whitcomb is the founder and president of Whitcomb Selinsky, PC. In addition, he manages the firm and heads up the Government Procurement and International Business Transactions practice areas.
Tim Turner is a member of Whitcomb Selinksy, PC’s Labor and Employment group. He centers his practice in the Health and Safety sector, defending clients against MSHA and OSHA regulatory enforcement actions.
Get Started in
Mar 9, 2020 by Whitcomb, Selinsky, PC Staff
Clawback provisions are clauses that specify a set of factors or situations in which...
Feb 21, 2020 by Joe Whitcomb
As you may already know, directors always owe a fiduciary duty to the corporation for which they are...
Feb 4, 2020 by Whitcomb, Selinsky, PC Staff
Most owners have an idea what they think their business is worth, even if they aren’t planning on selling it. Because...
Colorado
2000 South Colorado Blvd.
Tower #1 Suite 9500
Denver, CO 80222
(303)-647-1045 (local)
(303)-534-1958 (local)
Virginia
818 Sophia St.
Fredericksburg, VA 22401
(804)-773-4699 (local)
(804)-773-4699 (fax)
© 2024 · All Rights Reserved · Whitcomb, Selinsky, PC