Skip to the main content.
Free Case Review
BLOGS & LEGAL INSIGHTS:
BUSINESS LAW
Hero-Split-Right
CONSUMER LAW

Hero-Split-Left

 

WEBINARS

green lock security thumb

green lock security thumb

 

VIDEO LIBRARY

green lock security thumb

green lock security thumb

 

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

2 min read

Riley v. Paramount: Nursing Home Fraud and Malpractice Dispute

a caregiver assits an elderly person with a walker

Lloyd and Timothy Riley filed a lawsuit against Paramount Healthcare Consultants, LLC, and Cornerstone at the Ranch, a nursing home where their mother, Faye Riley, resided. They alleged that the nursing home failed to provide adequate care, leading to their mother’s deterioration and eventual death.

Faye Riley was a resident of the facility from November 2021 to April 2022. On April 24, 2022, she was found unresponsive and taken to a hospital, where she was diagnosed with septic shock, dehydration, malnutrition, and bacteremia. She died six days later.

The defendants sought dismissal of the case on the grounds that it was premature, arguing that they were protected under the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act (LMMA) and that the claims should first be reviewed by a medical review panel. The trial court agreed and dismissed the case without prejudice. The Rileys appealed the decision.

Appellate Court’s Decision

The Louisiana Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s decision and reinstated the lawsuit, ruling that:

  • The trial court improperly considered an uncertified document as proof that Paramount was a qualified healthcare provider under the LMMA. Without proper certification, there was no evidence establishing Paramount’s protected status under the law.
  • The Rileys’ claims included allegations of fraud and intentional misrepresentation, which fall outside the LMMA’s definition of medical malpractice. The LMMA covers only unintentional torts, meaning that claims involving deliberate wrongdoing do not require a medical review panel.
  • The plaintiffs alleged that the nursing home knowingly misrepresented its staffing capabilities when admitting their mother. They claimed the facility assured them it had adequate nursing staff, despite knowing it was severely understaffed and incapable of providing the necessary level of care.

Given these findings, the court ruled that the claims were not subject to the medical malpractice review process, and the lawsuit could proceed in civil court.

Implications for Nursing Home Liability

This decision clarifies key legal principles regarding claims against nursing homes and healthcare facilities:

  • Medical malpractice laws do not shield providers from claims of fraud or intentional misconduct. If a healthcare facility knowingly misrepresents its capabilities, it may be held liable under general tort law rather than the LMMA.
  • Facilities must ensure their patient admissions process accurately reflects their ability to provide care. False assurances about staffing levels and care standards can lead to legal liability.
  • Improper documentation cannot be used to establish protected status under medical malpractice laws. Nursing homes and healthcare providers must ensure they properly certify and authenticate their legal status if they seek LMMA protections.

Conclusion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal’s ruling allows the Rileys’ lawsuit to move forward, ensuring that their claims of wrongful death and fraudulent misrepresentation will be heard in court. The case underscores the legal limits of medical malpractice protections and the importance of holding healthcare providers accountable for misrepresentations that impact patient care.

Legal Support for Medical Malpractice and Nursing Home Claims

If you need legal assistance regarding medical malpractice, nursing home neglect, or wrongful death claims, contact us for experienced representation.