In City of Port Isabel v. FERC, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) reauthorization of two liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals in Cameron County, Texas. The City of Port Isabel and the Sierra Club challenged FERC’s compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), alleging deficiencies in environmental justice analysis, air quality monitoring, and carbon capture considerations.
The court examined whether FERC adequately addressed environmental impacts and adhered to NEPA's procedural requirements in its reauthorization of the Texas LNG and Rio Grande LNG projects.
Court's Findings
The court vacated FERC’s reauthorization orders, identifying several critical deficiencies:
-
Environmental Justice Analysis: FERC's failure to issue a supplemental environmental impact statement (EIS) addressing updated environmental justice data and broader geographic impacts was a significant oversight. The court found that new demographic data and expanded analysis required public engagement and transparency, which the supplemental EIS process would have ensured.
-
Air Quality Monitoring: FERC did not adequately justify its decision to exclude nearby air quality monitoring data, raising questions about the thoroughness of its environmental review.
-
Carbon Capture and Sequestration: FERC neglected to provide sufficient analysis or consider the feasibility of carbon capture technology in reducing emissions at one of the LNG facilities.
-
Failure to Address Cumulative Impacts: The court noted FERC’s inadequate consideration of cumulative environmental effects on low-income and minority communities, contradicting NEPA and executive orders emphasizing environmental justice.
Implications
This ruling highlights the increasing judicial scrutiny of federal agencies’ environmental reviews, especially concerning environmental justice and climate impacts. It underscores the necessity of comprehensive, transparent analyses when approving projects with significant community and environmental repercussions.
Expert Guidance for Complex Environmental Cases
Navigating federal environmental regulations requires deep expertise and careful planning. At Whitcomb Selinsky PC, our environmental law team provides tailored legal counsel for businesses and communities affected by federal agency actions. Visit our environmental law page to learn how we can assist you in navigating NEPA compliance and safeguarding your interests.
Joe Whitcomb
