Skip to the main content.
Free Case Review
BLOGS & LEGAL INSIGHTS:
BUSINESS LAW
Hero-Split-Right
CONSUMER LAW

Hero-Split-Left

 

WEBINARS

green lock security thumb

green lock security thumb

 

VIDEO LIBRARY

green lock security thumb

green lock security thumb

 

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

1 min read

Northshore Mining v. MSHA: Flagrant Safety Violations Upheld

Safety gear and chalkboard with text WORK SAFETY on wooden background

In Northshore Mining Co. v. Secretary of Labor, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed citations issued by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) for violations of safety standards at an iron ore processing facility in Silver Bay, Minnesota. The case stemmed from a workplace accident where a contract worker was injured due to deteriorating walkway conditions.

MSHA cited Northshore Mining for failing to maintain safe conditions on elevated walkways, as required under 30 C.F.R. § 56.11002. Additional citations addressed the company’s failure to barricade or warn workers of the hazardous conditions.

Findings of the ALJ and Commission

An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) determined that Northshore had shown reckless disregard for mandatory safety standards. Key findings included:

  • Knowledge of Unsafe Conditions: The company had been aware of walkway deterioration since at least 2015 but failed to make necessary repairs.
  • Ineffective Safety Measures: While Northshore implemented a fall protection policy, it did not address the underlying structural deficiencies.

The ALJ deleted the “flagrant” designation for one violation but imposed significant penalties, including individual fines for two supervisors. On review, the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission affirmed most findings but overturned the individual liability penalties.

Appeals Court Ruling

The Eighth Circuit upheld the Commission’s findings of reckless disregard and unwarrantable failure. Key points included:

  1. Reckless Disregard Standard: The court agreed that Northshore’s prolonged inaction constituted a conscious disregard of known hazards, supporting the reckless disregard designation.
  2. Unwarrantable Failure: The failure to repair or restrict access to deteriorated walkways over an extended period demonstrated aggravated negligence.
  3. Reinstated Penalties: The court reinstated the “flagrant” designation for one violation, aligning with statutory definitions under the Mine Act.

Implications

This decision underscores the importance of addressing known workplace hazards promptly to comply with MSHA regulations. It also highlights the serious financial and legal consequences of failing to ensure worker safety.

Protect Your Business with Expert Mining Safety Counsel

Maintaining compliance with MSHA standards is critical to protecting your workforce and avoiding costly penalties. At Whitcomb Selinsky PC, our experienced attorneys provide tailored guidance on mining safety law and regulatory disputes. Contact us to learn how we can support your operations.