2 min read
Great Lakes Insurance vs. Chartered Yachts Miami: Insurance Breach
In Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Chartered Yachts Miami LLC, the dispute centered around a marine insurance policy. The case was decided by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 6, 2023, and primarily involved questions of policy compliance, misrepresentations, and breach of warranties related to a marine insurance agreement.
Background of the Case
On March 8, 2020, Great Lakes Insurance SE issued a marine insurance policy to Chartered Yachts Miami LLC (CYM) covering an 88-foot Leopard vessel named "Petrus." The policy was set for a one-year term and included "Hull & Machinery" coverage of $725,000. The policy required strict compliance with safety and regulatory standards, with a significant focus on the seaworthiness of the vessel.
On November 7, 2020 seawater entered the vessel’s stern, causing damage. Great Lakes Insurance asserted that the vessel was not seaworthy at the time of the incident, citing issues like a malfunctioning transom door and a non-operational bilge pump.
Initial Insurance Application and Misrepresntations
Before issuing the policy, CYM's agent submitted an application to Great Lakes’ underwriter, Concept Special Risks Ltd., in March 2019. The application listed Greg Pack as the primary operator of the vessel, stating that he held a valid U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) 100-ton boating license. This representation was also included in a renewal questionnaire submitted on March 5, 2020. Based on these assertions, Great Lakes agreed to issue and renew the policy.
However, it was later revealed that Greg Pack’s USCG license had expired approximately 10-15 years prior, meaning he did not hold a valid license during the application or at any time when the policy was in effect. This discrepancy became a significant point of contention as it directly contradicted the representations made in both the initial application and renewal questionnaire.
Incident and Post-Loss Investigation
The damage incident occurred during the active policy period. Great Lakes Insurance initiated an investigation and uncovered several inconsistencies between the insured's stated compliance and the actual condition of the vessel. Among the findings:
- The vessel had only one life raft with an expired certification (January 2018), despite recommendations requiring annual inspection.
- The vessel lacked necessary safety equipment, including an Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB) and flares, both required by the pre-policy survey conducted by Global International Marine Surveyors.
The insured party claimed that the equipment was present during the incident, alleging that it was lost during the water ingress. However, Great Lakes' investigation concluded that several safety deficiencies had not been addressed as mandated by the survey compliance warranty included in the policy.
Court Findings on Policy Breach
The court evaluated whether the insurance policy was breached based on the doctrine of uberrimae fidei (utmost good faith), which requires full and honest disclosure of material facts by the insured. The court found that:
- Misrepresentation of Qualifications: Greg Pack did not hold a valid USCG license at the time of the policy issuance, a material misrepresentation that influenced the underwriter’s decision.
- Non-Compliance with Survey Recommendations: The vessel failed to meet several safety recommendations outlined in the Global Survey, breaching the survey compliance warranty under New York law, which requires strict adherence to marine policy warranties.
- Breach of Legal and Regulatory Compliance: The policy explicitly required adherence to all legal and regulatory standards. The failure to have certified safety equipment violated U.S. Coast Guard regulations, further breaching the policy’s terms.
Court's Ruling
On June 6, 2023, the court granted Great Lakes Insurance SE’s Motion for Summary Judgment, effectively declaring that the policy was void ab initio (from the beginning) due to the breaches committed by CYM. This ruling meant that Great Lakes was not liable for any claims related to the incident, given the insured’s failure to comply with the warranties and the misrepresentations in the insurance application.
Conclusion
The Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Chartered Yachts Miami LLC case highlights the importance of transparency and adherence to safety regulations in marine insurance. The decision underscores how breaches in policy terms, particularly related to the accuracy of information provided and compliance with safety standards, can lead to a complete denial of coverage.