1 min read
KenAmerican v. MSHA: Advance Notice Violations Upheld in Court
In Kenamerican Resources, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit addressed a violation under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act. The case involved the Paradise No. 9 Mine in Kentucky, where Kenamerican Resources was cited for providing advance notice of a Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) inspection.
The citation arose from a dispatcher’s conversation with a miner using coded language that allegedly tipped off workers about the impending inspection. MSHA regulations prohibit advance notice to ensure inspections accurately reflect mine safety conditions.
Initial Proceedings
An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) initially vacated the citation, finding the dispatcher’s comments ambiguous and insufficient to establish a violation. However, the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission reversed this decision, directing the ALJ to reassess the facts and impose an appropriate penalty.
On remand, the ALJ upheld the violation and assessed a penalty of $18,742, which was affirmed by the Commission. Kenamerican petitioned the Sixth Circuit for review, arguing that the citation misinterpreted the statute and violated free speech protections.
Appeals Court Decision
The Sixth Circuit denied Kenamerican’s petition, affirming the citation. Key points in the ruling included:
-
Scope of Section 103(a): The court rejected Kenamerican’s argument that the advance notice prohibition applied only to MSHA representatives. It emphasized the statute’s clear language prohibiting “any person” from providing such notice.
-
Evidence of Violation: The court agreed with the Commission that the dispatcher’s statement, “I think there is,” in response to a miner’s query, constituted advance notice. The miner likely inferred MSHA’s presence and used the information to prepare for inspection.
-
First Amendment Challenge: The court upheld the regulation’s constitutionality, finding it narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest in mine safety. The prohibition on advance notice ensures inspections reflect actual conditions, preventing preemptive fixes that obscure violations.
-
Penalty Assessment: The $18,742 penalty was deemed appropriate, reflecting the gravity of the violation and its potential impact on mine safety.
Implications
This ruling underscores the broad applicability of MSHA’s advance notice prohibition and its critical role in maintaining safe mining operations. It highlights the legal and financial risks for operators who fail to comply with inspection regulations.
Navigate Mining Safety Compliance with Confidence
Understanding and complying with MSHA regulations is essential for mining operators. At Whitcomb Selinsky PC, our experienced attorneys provide comprehensive guidance on mining safety and compliance matters. Visit our mining safety law page to learn how we can support your business in navigating complex regulatory requirements.