1 min read
Saud v. DePaul Univ.: University’s Hiring Decisions Deemed Non-Discriminatory
Joe Whitcomb
:
March 25, 2026
Employment Background and Dispute
Saud brought claims against DePaul University arising from his employment and subsequent termination. The case centered on allegations related to workplace conduct, disciplinary actions, and the circumstances surrounding the end of his employment.
During his employment, Saud held a faculty position at DePaul University. Over time, concerns arose regarding his conduct and compliance with university policies. These concerns led to internal review and disciplinary proceedings.
DePaul conducted an investigation into the reported issues. The process included evaluation of Saud’s actions and whether those actions aligned with institutional standards. Following this process, the university made a determination regarding his employment status.
Disciplinary Process and Termination
After completing its review, DePaul terminated Saud’s employment. The decision followed the university’s internal procedures for addressing faculty conduct. Saud challenged the basis for that decision and the procedures used to reach it.
Saud filed suit asserting claims connected to his termination. His claims included allegations tied to employment law protections and the handling of disciplinary procedures.
District Court Proceedings
The district court reviewed Saud’s claims and the supporting record. The court evaluated whether the allegations stated viable claims under applicable law.
The court determined that the claims did not meet the required legal standards. It dismissed the case based on deficiencies in the allegations and the applicable legal framework.
Appellate Review
Saud appealed the dismissal. The appellate court reviewed the district court’s decision and examined the legal sufficiency of the claims.
The court analyzed the employment-related claims and the factual allegations presented. It considered whether Saud had established grounds for relief under the relevant statutes and legal principles.
The appellate court concluded that the claims were not sufficient to proceed. It affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the case.
Court’s Decision
The appellate court upheld the dismissal of Saud’s claims against DePaul University. The court found that the allegations did not support a viable claim under the governing law.
Labor and Employment Representation
If you are dealing with workplace disputes, our team handles matters involving employment agreements, workplace policies, disciplinary actions, and termination issues. Contact us to learn how our team can assist with your situation.

