1 min read
Wells v. Quintero: Malpractice Counts Dismissed for Lack of Corroboration
Joe Whitcomb
:
March 24, 2026
Medical Treatment and Alleged Negligence
Marcos Wells filed a medical malpractice action against Dr. Quintero and related providers after receiving medical care for ongoing health issues. Wells alleged that the providers failed to properly diagnose and treat his condition. He claimed that this failure caused his condition to worsen and led to additional harm.
Wells received care from Dr. Quintero, who was responsible for evaluating his symptoms and determining treatment. According to the complaint, the care provided did not meet the applicable standard of care. Wells alleged that appropriate medical action at an earlier stage would have prevented further injury.
As his condition progressed, Wells required additional medical treatment. He attributed this progression to earlier decisions made during his care. These allegations formed the basis of his malpractice claims.
Procedural Requirements and Dismissal
Wells filed suit asserting medical negligence claims. The defendants responded by challenging whether he had complied with Florida’s pre-suit requirements for medical malpractice actions.
Florida law requires claimants to complete specific steps before filing a medical malpractice lawsuit. These include providing notice and obtaining a supporting medical opinion. The defendants argued that Wells did not meet these requirements.
The trial court reviewed the complaint and supporting materials. It determined that Wells had not satisfied the statutory requirements. Based on this, the court dismissed the case.
Appeal and Court Review
Wells appealed the dismissal. He argued that his filings were sufficient or that any deficiencies should not have resulted in dismissal.
The appellate court reviewed whether Wells complied with the statutory pre-suit framework. It analyzed whether the required steps had been completed and whether the documentation met legal standards.
The court emphasized that these requirements are mandatory. They must be satisfied before a medical malpractice claim can proceed.
Court’s Decision
After reviewing the record, the appellate court found that Wells did not meet the required pre-suit conditions. The deficiencies identified by the trial court remained unresolved.
The court affirmed the dismissal. It held that failure to comply with pre-suit requirements was sufficient to bar the claim.
Medical Malpractice Representation
If you are dealing with medical negligence, our team handles cases involving failures to diagnose, treatment errors, and other forms of healthcare-related negligence. If you are dealing with medical negligence, our team handles cases involving failures to diagnose, treatment errors, and other forms of healthcare-related negligence. Contact us to learn how our team can assist with your situation.

