top of page

Bradford v. DOL: Outdoor Outfitters Must Comply with Wage Rule

Writer: Joe Whitcomb
Joe Whitcomb
Feb 7, 2025
1 min read

Updated: 3 days ago

The D.C. Circuit ruled against Michael Bradford in his federal whistleblower-retaliation dispute with the Department of Labor. The court found insufficient evidence connecting his termination to protected activity and accepted the agency’s documented performance-based reasons. The decision highlights the evidentiary burden in retaliation cases.

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page