Succession Planning and How to Protect the Future of Your Business
Most business owners do not think enough about business succession planning or think they are too young to worry about it, so they never address the issue. Don't leave your family members or the future of your business hanging.
A succession plan crafted by a business succession planning attorney is essential to ensure your successful business continues to run smoothly when a CEO or key manager becomes incapacitated, resigns, or even dies. In such unforeseen circumstances, the last thing you want to be left without is buy-sell agreements, resulting in chaotic daily operations after years of hard work to build up business assets.
Whether your business entity is a sole proprietorship, general partnership, one or many family-owned businesses or even a large corporation, business succession planning for all key management positions needs to be established.
When do I Need a Commercial Litigation Attorney?
The goal is to have someone in place who is qualified to take over as CEO through the normal course of business or in an emergency situation. This should also be established for any critical roles when or if the need arises.
For each key leadership role, including the CEO, the CEO's direct reports, and other key positions, the board or committee should establish a sound business succession plan with the input of expert legal advice regarding business law.
Among other things, comprehensive succession plans regularly evaluate the senior leadership team's strengths and weaknesses and establish individual plans for professional development designed to prepare these executives for advancement and avoid succession planning mistakes, enabling a seamless transition.
Business Succession Planning Overview
Adopting an effective succession planning process starts with the Board or designated committee understanding the company’s strategic needs and leadership requirements. They must determine when to engage corporate counsel, when to prioritize internal candidates, and when an external search is necessary. At the center of business succession planning is management and leadership development: building a culture that develops leaders at all levels through ongoing learning, targeted assignments, and clear growth paths.
Best Practices in Succession Planning
Best practices include regularly assessing candidates, involving senior leaders in development and succession discussions, and aligning roles and stretch assignments with individuals’ strengths and weaknesses. This culture should emphasize retention of top talent and provide meaningful feedback and development opportunities.
Unique Challenges Companies Face
Several obstacles commonly undermine business succession planning. It can be uncomfortable to tell a sitting CEO that the board must plan for their potential departure, including resignation, dismissal, or unexpected events. Some CEOs resist formal planning or legal tools like buy-sell agreements, especially when business performance is strong. Boards may also treat succession planning as less urgent than day-to-day issues, or misunderstand what an effective succession plan requires, particularly when they fail to seek guidance from a business succession planning attorney. It is essential to remember that succession planning applies to all key management roles, not only the CEO.
Roles of HR and The Board of Directors in a Succession Plan
Succession planning is inherently long-term. Ideally, potential successors are identified several years in advance, supported by targeted development plans, training, mentorship, and challenging assignments, with progress monitored and plans adjusted over time. Human Resources plays a central role by helping design the framework, identify and assess talent, deliver leadership training, facilitate mentorship, communicate the process, and track development data. The Board of Directors provides mission-critical oversight, ensuring leadership continuity in C‑suite and other key roles, maintaining strategic focus, and stewarding hiring decisions that protect stakeholders and organizational continuity.
To measure effectiveness, organizations should track internal promotion rates and engagement with development opportunities, and review succession plans at least annually or more often after strategic shifts, leadership departures, internal promotions, or significant organizational changes.
We Can Help
An expert business succession planning attorney can be pivotal in navigating this complex - but highly necessary - process.
Small Firm Attention.Big Firm Results.
Business Succession Planning FAQs
-
Failing to align on strategy.
-
Over-involving the full board.
-
Conducting internal assessments and
-
Making organizational changes too late.
-
Creating a "horse race" too early.
-
Neglecting external benchmarking
-
Over-valuating external candidates.
Failing to update the plan regularly.
-
Every Board of Directors has the fiduciary duty to address major business risks, including the loss of a senior executive. Risk management is a critical aspect of this duty, ensuring that the board identifies potential conflicts to business operations and creates an effective succession plan to mitigate them effectively. The board must act in good faith, with due diligence, and in the best interests of the company. The board’s approach to succession planning and unexpected events should be reasonable under the circumstances.
For every key position within the management structure, in addition to the CEO, a plan needs to be in place. What will happen if this person leaves immediately? What will happen if this person leaves in a timeframe that can be expected and planned for? Are there managers in place who are qualified to take over “in a pinch” so that organizational structures don't suffer needlessly?
The BoD is mission-critical when it comes to overseeing an effective business succession plan. Its mandate should ensure leadership continuity by identifying, developing and selecting future leaders the C-level roles, as well as other key management roles. Additionally, the BoD should be developing and recruiting new board members as needs arise. In short, the BoD is a key player in
maintaining strategic focus, stewarding the process generally with the help of the current CEO and Human Resources, and championing hiring decisions that protect both stakeholder interests and organizational continuity.Some boards may not be engaging in sufficient succession planning that reflects the importance of leadership transitions.
-
52% of private companies say that building and maintaining a strong talent pipeline is the hardest part of CEO succession planning.
-
74% of executives say they don't have the training required for the challenges they face in their roles.
-
Additionally, 40% of Fortune 500 companies report being cimpletely unable to replace the CEO with an internal candidate. Even the most elite businesses struggle to demonstrate effectiveness.
-
Companies gearing up for commercial litigation need to weigh several crucial considerations. A primary factor is evaluating the financial stability of the opposing party to ascertain their capability to fulfill a judgment. Implementing a protocol for conducting a thorough analysis of litigation risks and rewards for substantial and intricate disputes is advisable, as outlined in § 4.01 Pre-Litigation Analysis of Disputes. Additional factors to consider include the potential impact of commercial principles or legal issues on the company's broader operations, the legal jurisdiction of the case, the competence of the plaintiff's legal representation, and the presence of any additional parties that may share liability. It's also vital to compare the monetary value of the claim against the expenses associated with its defense, as mentioned in § 4.01 Development of a Litigation Plan.
Regarding the preparation of documents, it's crucial to understand that materials gathered from third parties for litigation purposes don't automatically receive work product privilege if they're created as part of normal business operations before litigation begins, as per the USCS Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26, which outlines the Duty to Disclose and the General Provisions Governing Discovery. Documents produced during the regular course of business lack the protective shield against disclosure, as evidenced in cases like Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. vs. FDIC (302 F.R.D. 497), Electronic Data Systems Corp. vs. Steingraber (2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11818), and Reedhycalog UK Ltd. vs. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. (242 F.R.D. 357). Nonetheless, it's important to note that documents don't have to be created with the sole intention of litigation to be considered under the umbrella of work-product privilege, a principle highlighted in the case of Strougo vs. BEA Associates (199 F.R.D. 515).
Furthermore, effective litigation management hinges on the strategic coordination of external legal teams and internal corporate efforts. Understanding the comprehensive ramifications—whether it's a victory, a settlement, or a defeat—is paramount and should be meticulously evaluated to the fullest extent feasible, as highlighted in § 7.08 Other Considerations in Managing Litigation.
Competency modeling is a systematic approach to defining the specific skills, knowledge, behaviors, and attributes (SKBAs) required for success in a critical position within an organization. It essentially creates a blueprint for what high performance looks like in leadership positions. Here's how it works::
-
Identifying Competencies: The process starts with identifying the key competencies critical for success in a role. This might involve analyzing job descriptions, performance reviews, and conversations with experts in the field.
-
Defining Levels: Once core competencies are identified, different levels of proficiency are defined for each. For example, a competency like "communication" might have levels ranging from "clearly conveys information" to "inspires and motivates others through communication."
-
Creating a Framework: By combining competencies and their proficiency levels, a competency model is built. This framework serves as a benchmark for evaluating internal talent and identifying potential for future roles.
-
A good habit is to review and update your formal succession plan annually, along with your business succession planning attorney. However, it's important to be adaptable and revisit the plan more frequently under certain circumstances. Here are some triggers for an update:
-
Strategic Shifts: If your organization undergoes a significant change in strategy, your leadership needs might evolve as well. This necessitates reviewing the succession plan to ensure it aligns with the new direction.
-
Leadership Departures: When key leaders leave the company, planned or unplanned, the succession plan needs to be adjusted to address the resulting vacancies.
-
Internal Promotions: Promotions within the organization can create new openings or reveal potential successors who have emerged through their performance.
-
There are a few key metrics that can help gauge the effectiveness of your succession planning program. Here are a couple:
-
Promotion Rate of Internal Candidates: Track the percentage of open positions filled by promoting from within. A consistently high internal promotion rate suggests your succession plan is identifying and developing strong talent.
-
Employee Engagement with Development Opportunities: Employees who feel their potential is being nurtured through the program are more likely to stay engaged and committed to the organization. Conduct surveys or hold focus groups to understand employee sentiment.
-
In order to create a successful Succession Plan, the Board or committee will need to consider the needs of the company. The Board or committee will need to determine when it’s time to:
-
Retain corporate counsel for assistance
-
Consider internal candidates
-
Conduct an external search
-
Determine that enough information has been obtained to support an informed judgment
A major component of succession planning is management development. A culture of leadership development needs to be established and reinforced.
Best-practice succession planning procedures include:-
Assessing and evaluating candidates regularly and consistently
-
Involving executives and senior management in both development plans and succession planning
-
Focusing on individuals' strengths and weaknesses and targeting individuals' assignments based on this information
-
Reinforcing a culture of leadership development, planning to retain and obtain top talent by individual as well as by position
-
Providing feedback and opportunities to candidates assessed (APQC, 2001; Best Practices, LLC, 2008; Cohn, Khurana, & Reeves, 2005; Conger & Fulmer, 2003; Fegley, 2006; Groves, 2007, Herman, 2006).
-
In the event of a CEO transition, having an action plan in place assists the Board in taking appropriate action.
An independent director should be chosen to organize special executive sessions to discuss issues related to succession and should have the ability to contact all independent directors in an emergency fashion. A business succession planning attorney should be retained to assist with employment law questions as well as SEC reporting and corporate governance.
Public relations and investor relations may also need to be taken into consideration.
If there are no qualified internal candidates prepared to take over the role, a search firm may also need to be retained to locate a qualified external candidate.
There could be a time when requesting a resignation from the CEO is the right move to make. There are numerous factors to be considered before making such a request.
-
The Board needs to determine that a majority of the directors is interested in removing the CEO in an expedited fashion.
-
A confidential executive session may be called for independent and non-management directors to discuss options without the CEO present. During this private executive session, the formal decision to replace the CEO will not be made. The directors will consider whether to pursue the resignation of the CEO; potential successor(s) (either interim or permanent); potential successor(s) for the internal candidate selected; how to manage the potential impacts on critical relationships and agreements of the transition to a new CEO; and when general counsel should be information of the consideration of replacing the CEO.
-
Outside counsel should review by-laws and corporate laws, as well as any employment agreement with the CEO concerning his director role.
-
Once the independent and non-management directors agree to seek the CEO’s resignation, typically one or two of the directors will meet with the CEO and discuss the possible terms for his resignation. If a termination for cause is a possibility, a discussion is typically had within the Board as to whether it would benefit the company to accept a resignation rather than go through the potential scandal of a termination for cause. During this discussion, the Directors need to make it clear that they are not negotiating whether or not there will be a resignation, just the terms of that resignation. It is not in the best interest of the company to allow the CEO to think he has “wiggle room” and could convince any Director(s) to change their minds. The Directors need to provide a clear picture as to what the terms of the resignation will look like.
-
Once the CEO has agreed to resign or it has become evident that he will not agree, the Board of Directors must hold a formally noticed meeting, for which the CEO is entitled to notice. If the CEO attends the meeting, the Board can seek his recusal or pass a resolution that the decision be delegated to the independent and non-managing directors, and a private executive session can be called at a later time and/or in a different place.
-
Next, the board will hold a meeting to appoint a successor or interim CEO.
-
While succession planning is often challenging, it is one of the most important tasks a Board must address. It is important to remember that succession planning does not apply only to the CEO, but to all key management/senior executive positions as well as the Board itself. Management development is key. The end goal is to be prepared for any anticipated or unforeseen vacation of a key position in your company, ensuring business continuity and asset protection during leadership transitions. Accounting for every nuance of this process is exactly why a business succession planning attorney is invaluable to retain.
The timeline for succession planning is a long-term proposition, ideally starting well before a planned leadership transition. Here's a breakdown:
-
Early Identification: Ideally, potential successors should be identified several years before they might be needed to fill a role. This allows ample time for employee development and ensures a smooth handover when the transition occurs.
-
Development and Training: Once potential successors are identified, a targeted career development plan should be created to equip them with the necessary skill sets and experience. This might involve leadership training programs, mentorship opportunities, or project assignments that stretch their abilities.
-
Ongoing Monitoring: Potential successors' performance and progress should be monitored regularly as they progress through the development programs. This allows for adjustments to the plan or identification of additional candidates if necessary.
-
Exit Strategy: In addition to identifying and developing successors, a comprehensive succession plan should include a well-defined exit strategy for outgoing executives, ensuring a smooth transition and minimizing disruption to the business.
-
Human resources (HR) plays a pivotal role in the entire succession planning process. Here's a glimpse into their contributions:
-
Developing the Framework: HR collaborates with leadership to develop the succession planning framework, including competency models and talent assessment tools.
-
Identifying and Assessing Talent: HR helps identify potential successors through various methods, such as performance reviews, development discussions, and assessment tools.
-
Developing Training Programs: HR takes the lead in creating and delivering training programs designed to develop the skills and knowledge needed for leadership roles.
-
Facilitating Mentorship: HR can play a key role in facilitating mentorship programs that connect high-potential employees with experienced leaders. These mentors can provide guidance, support, and insights that accelerate the development of future leaders.
-
Communication and Transparency: HR plays a crucial role in communicating the business succession planning process to employees. This fosters transparency and helps employees understand their development opportunities within the organization.
-
Tracking Progress and Maintaining Records: HR is responsible for tracking the progress of potential successors through the development pipeline. This might involve maintaining records of training completed, performance evaluations, and development goals achieved and other aspects related to employment contracts.
By taking a proactive and comprehensive approach to succession planning, HR professionals can ensure a smooth transition of leadership when the time comes. This not only benefits the organization by ensuring continuity and stability but also boosts employee morale by demonstrating the company's commitment to developing the next generation from within its own talent pool.
-
Get Started in
3 EASY STEPS
01
Discuss Your Claim
Understand your situation and identify the best path forward.
02
Explore Your Options
Review your legal options and choose the right strategy.
03
We Will Advocate For You
Get dedicated support and strong representation every step of the way.
LET'S TALK
Ready to Simplify Your Documents?
Get in touch today for a free consultation and discover how we can create a custom solution for your business.
In 2022, The Kroger Co. and Albertsons Companies, Inc. announced plans to merge in a $24.6 billion transaction that...
Elmer Miller, doing business as Miller Building Systems, LLC, operated a construction business in Arcola, Illinois. In 2022
United Aeronautical disputed Air Force actions concerning contract performance, payment, and alleged deficiencies.
