top of page

Strock Case Revives FCA Claims Over SDVOSB Contract Fraud

Writer: Joe Whitcomb
Joe Whitcomb
Mar 30, 2025
1 min read

Updated: 2 days ago

In United States v. Strock, the government alleged that Strock Contracting and its owner misrepresented service-disabled veteran ownership and control to obtain SDVOSB set-aside contracts. The Second Circuit held that fraudulent eligibility representations made during certification and bidding can support False Claims Act liability when they are connected to later government payments. The appellate court revived the FCA claims and remanded for further proceedings.

 
 
 

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page