Patel v. Tulsa Pain: Contract Terms Bar At-Will Employment Claim

Patel v. Tulsa Pain Consultants concerned a wrongful-termination dispute and an employment agreement containing an attorney-fee provision. The Oklahoma Supreme Court held that because the contract had to be interpreted to determine Patel's employment status, the contractual fee provision applied. The employer, as prevailing party, was entitled to seek reasonable attorney fees.

Original article:https://www.whitcomblawpc.com/business-law-blog/patel-v.-tulsa-pain-contract-terms-bar-at-will-employment-claim