Kologik Capital v. In Force: Court Rulings & Patent Insights

Kologik Capital, LLC sued In Force Technology and related defendants over alleged infringement of a patent concerning emergency-responder coordination, along with trademark, unfair-trade-practices, and false-advertising claims. The litigation required the court to construe disputed patent language and evaluate whether InForce911's software practiced the claimed method.

The court concluded that the undisputed evidence did not establish literal infringement and granted summary judgment of non-infringement. It also rejected challenges to the patent's validity and denied Kologik's request for discovery sanctions. The case highlights the importance of precise claim construction and evidence addressing every limitation of an asserted patent claim.

Original article:https://www.whitcomblawpc.com/business-law-blog/kologik-v.-inforce911-dispute