Prevent Costly Procurement Disasters: 6 Science-Backed Techniques For Bias-Free Decision Making
A biased bid selection process represents one of the biggest threats for procurement officials. Such bias leads to a bad selection decision for a...
1 min read
Nathan J.D. Veldhuis
:
Jun 1, 2022 6:00:00 PM
In medical malpractice cases, the expert witness’s white coat is being tailored by the Virginia Supreme Court. Recently, that white coat has been “let out” and then “taken in.” When the Court issued its opinion in Christian v. Surgical Specialists of Richmond, LTD., 268 Va. 60, 596 S.E.2d 522 (2004), in June last year, it got easier to qualify an out-of-state expert to testify on the standard of care in Virginia courts. On January 14, 2005, in Hinkley v. Koehler, 269 Va. 82, 606 S.E.2d. 803 (2005), the Court excluded an expert in a manner that made it somewhat more difficult to qualify an expert in a medical malpractice case. Attorneys representing clients in medical malpractice litigation should be aware of the Virginia Supreme Court’s ongoing “sartorial” efforts.
To read this article in its entirety, please click here. The article is located on pages 1, 4-7.
A biased bid selection process represents one of the biggest threats for procurement officials. Such bias leads to a bad selection decision for a...
There are different levels of disability that can result from serious work injuries: temporary partial disability (TPD); permanent partial disability...
Neuro-Quantum Studies Produce Objective Findings of Traumatic Brain Injury By Nathan J.D. Veldhuis